Archive for the ‘Facilitation’ Category

Facilitation at its worst—and best!

Wednesday, October 20th, 2010

As readers of this blog will know, I almost always focus on the positive ways in which we can improve our communications, whether as speakers or facilitators. Recently, however, someone wrote and asked, “What are the worst things you can do as a facilitator?” So here goes—my list of the 10 worst things a facilitator or meeting chair can do:

1. Embarrass or humiliate a member of the group
2. Lose your temper
3. Smirk or giggle at something someone said
4. Forcefully give your own opinion without listening to the other members of the group
5. Carry on a side conversation
6. Favor one person or small group over other members of the group
7. Not listen to what group members say
8. Take credit for someone else’s work
9. Shut people off dismissively before they have made their point(s)
10. Not trust the group process

So what about the 10 best things a facilitator can do? Here are 10 of my favorites:

1. Value the contributions of each and every member of the group
2. Listen not just to the words but to the body language of the speaker
3. Demonstrate respect for each person at the table, whether you agree with their position or not
4. Stay focused on the needs of the group
5. Prepare fully for the meeting—that means understanding the agenda, the likely issues and the potential points of view that will be expressed around the table
6. Encourage each member of the group to contribute to the meeting
7. Thank each person for his or her contribution
8. Check in with the group to see if everyone is satisfied with the process and the progress
9. Summarize key points and get confirmation from the group that you’ve summarized the issues and outcomes accurately
10. Smile…and say “thank you” again

Great Facilitation: It all begins with attitude

Thursday, August 5th, 2010

Think about the last time you were in a meeting that went well. How did you feel when it was over? Were you pleased with your own contributions? Did everyone have a chance to speak—and be heard? Were group conflicts or disagreements resolved constructively? Did the group arrive at a satisfactory outcome on time? Was the atmosphere relaxed, even if the issues on the table where challenging? If you answered yes to most of these questions, chances are the leader did a great job of facilitating the meeting.

And chances are, too, that facilitator cared about each and every person in the group—and the group as a whole. Caring about other people—and making sure each person is heard and valued—is fundamental to good facilitation. It is also one of the most difficult concepts to explain and help others to integrate into their work.

Over the years I’ve found that my own attitude about a group or particular individuals in a group can significantly influence both the process and outcomes of the meeting. In the early days of my work, I frequently worried well before the meeting that some individuals be “difficult”. I thought they might ask inappropriate questions, take the group off topic, take too long to make their points, argue for the sake of arguing, express negative or cynical attitudes or worse! Often with great anxiety, I would prepare for the meeting with an eye on those one or two people who I thought could be “trouble.” I could work myself up into quite a state, so much so that when the meeting actually began, I’d find myself focused more those individuals than anyone else. By the end of the meeting, I was utterly exhausted and I often felt people left the room dissatisfied, even if the group had achieved a useful outcome.

Then one day, I saw my friend and colleague, Jack, run a meeting. Almost effortlessly, Jack took us through the agenda, making sure everyone had a chance to speak, looking at each person with kindness when they spoke, summarizing as we went along, offering supportive comments to give us a mental break when the going got tough, smiling when we arrived at consensus and thanking each person, no matter how intelligible or otherwise their contributions! I’d never seen anything quite like it—nor had I ever left a meeting feeling so personally empowered to do my work after the meeting!

Later, when I asked Jack how he’d “learned” to facilitate like that, he simply smiled and said, “What’s to learn? I love people. I look at them and know we all want the same things: we don’t want to have our time wasted sitting in boring meetings. We want to be liked. We want to be valued. And especially in a meeting, we want to be respected. We also want to have fun, if given half a chance! I just do what comes naturally.” He made it sound so, so easy. I asked him how he dealt with “difficult” people. He threw his head back and just laughed, “Hey, we’re all difficult at one time or another! That’s human nature too. You just gotta accept it and go with the flow! There is always a way to find value in what people say.”

What a concept: that every contribution to a meeting has value!

Certainly that conversation was one of the most important of my career. Like Jack, I shared a passion for other people, but in those early days I realized that I’d sometimes let my concerns override my sense of caring—and my joy of working with others. In some ways, I’d stopped listening because I was worried about what might happen. I’d stopped focusing on the positive energy in the room and had transferred my focus to the potentially negative! I also realized that Jack’s great facilitation skills were just that—they were skills that he’d honed and practiced over the years, building on his extraordinary ability to listen and to genuinely find something of value in everyone he met or worked with.

For sure, Jack was a great mentor. And hundreds, if not thousands of meetings later, I’d like to believe that those early lessons helped me to hone my own skills and tune in to my fundamental belief that everyone does have something to offer; that every person we interact with is important in ways we might not always recognize; and that individuals around the world, really do want the same things: Respect, appreciation and friendship.

As a facilitator and as a trainer of others who want to learn or improve their facilitation skills, I’ve found that developing a positive, caring and appreciative attitude is essential to effective facilitation. Developing the accompanying skills is icing on the cake—something almost everyone can learn and apply in their pursuit of the Art of People.

Great Facilitation: It All Begins with Attitude

Think about the last time you were in a meeting that went well. How did you feel when it was over? Were you pleased with your own contributions? Did everyone have a chance to speak—and be heard? Were group conflicts or disagreements resolved constructively? Did the group arrive at a satisfactory outcome on time? Was the atmosphere relaxed, even if the issues on the table where challenging? If you answered yes to most of these questions, chances are the leader did a great job of facilitating the meeting.

And chances are, too, that facilitator cared about each and every person in the group—and the group as a whole. Caring about other people—and making sure each person is heard and valued—is fundamental to good facilitation. It is also one of the most difficult concepts to explain and help others to integrate into their work.

Over the years I’ve found that my own attitude about a group or particular individuals in a group can significantly influence both the process and outcomes of the meeting. In the early days of my work, I frequently worried well before the meeting that some individuals be “difficult”. I thought they might ask inappropriate questions, take the group off topic, take too long to make their points, argue for the sake of arguing, express negative or cynical attitudes or worse! Often with great anxiety, I would prepare for the meeting with an eye on those one or two people who I thought could be “trouble.” I could work myself up into quite a state, so much so that when the meeting actually began, I’d find myself focused more those individuals than anyone else. By the end of the meeting, I was utterly exhausted and I often felt people left the room dissatisfied, even if the group had achieved a useful outcome.

Then one day, I saw my friend and colleague, Jack, run a meeting. Almost effortlessly, Jack took us through the agenda, making sure everyone had a chance to speak, looking at each person with kindness when they spoke, summarizing as we went along, offering supportive comments to give us a mental break when the going got tough, smiling when we arrived at consensus and thanking each person, no matter how intelligible or otherwise their contributions! I’d never seen anything quite like it—nor had I ever left a meeting feeling so personally empowered to do my work after the meeting!

Later, when I asked Jack how he’d “learned” to facilitate like that, he simply smiled and said, “What’s to learn? I love people. I look at them and know we all want the same things: we don’t want to have our time wasted sitting in boring meetings. We want to be liked. We want to be valued. And especially in a meeting, we want to be respected. We also want to have fun, if given half a chance! I just do what comes naturally.” He made it sound so, so easy. I asked him how he dealt with “difficult” people. He threw his head back and just laughed, “Hey, we’re all difficult at one time or another! That’s human nature too. You just gotta accept it and go with the flow! There is always a way to find value in what people say.”

What a concept: that every contribution to a meeting has value!

Certainly that conversation was one of the most important of my career. Like Jack, I shared a passion for other people, but in those early days I realized that I’d sometimes let my concerns override my sense of caring—and my joy of working with others. In some ways, I’d stopped listening because I was worried about what might happen. I’d stopped focusing on the positive energy in the room and had transferred my focus to the potentially negative! I also realized that Jack’s great facilitation skills were just that—they were skills that he’d honed and practiced over the years, building on his extraordinary ability to listen and to genuinely find something of value in everyone he met or worked with.

For sure, Jack was a great mentor. And hundreds, if not thousands of meetings later, I’d like to believe that those early lessons helped me to hone my own skills and tune in to my fundamental belief that everyone does have something to offer; that every person we interact with is important in ways we might not always recognize; and that individuals around the world, really do want the same things: Respect, appreciation and friendship.

As a facilitator and as a trainer of others who want to learn or improve their facilitation skills, I’ve found that developing a positive, caring and appreciative attitude is essential to effective facilitation. Developing the accompanying skills is icing on the cake—something almost everyone can learn and apply in their pursuit of the Art of People.

Evaluating Meeting Effectiveness

Monday, June 7th, 2010

When you facilitate a meeting, do you take time to evaluate the overall effectiveness of the meeting and your ability to support the group to achieve a positive outcome? Reviewing both is a bit like assessing your performance in athletics, acting or almost anything else. It is absolutely essential if you want to systematically improve.

Sometimes, of course, we don’t know exactly what to evaluate–so I thought a  few tips might be helpful. In this blog, I’ll focus on the overall effectiveness of a meeting; in a later one, I’ll focus on the specific role of the facilitator or meeting chair.

Before you review the questions below to guide your evaluation,  you might want to develop a rating scale, say from 1 to 4, with 1 representing “no, not at all” to 4 represeting, “yes, well done.” Anything below a three needs work!

Overall meeting effectiveness:

1. Was an agenda developed prior to the meeting?

2. Were participants able to provide input into the agenda?

3. Did the agenda clearly state the purpose of the meeting, key objectives and  desired outcomes?

4. Did participants receive the meeting announcement and any background information in time to adequately prepare?

5. Were requests for inputs or presentations at the meeting clearly linked to the purpose and objectives of the meeting?

6. At the start of the meeting, did you (or the facilitator) review the agenda, the time lines for each topic and the reason for that topic on the agenda?

7. Did the meeting start within 5 minutes of the scheduled time?

8. Did the meeting follow the agenda and the allocated time lines?

9. Were key points appropriately summarized?

10. Were responsibilities for action items clearly articulated?

11. Did the meeting end within 5 minutes of its scheduled end time?

12. Did the faciliator ask participants for feedback regarding the meeting’s success or what could have been better?

Taking just a few minutes to answer these questions  honestly will help you and your team develop a sure-fire strategy to improve both the productivity of meetings and the groups’  level of satisfaction. It also clearly demonstrates not just your commitment to continuous improvement but also to the Art of People…

The Music of Meetings

Wednesday, April 21st, 2010

Have you ever thought about how a well-run meeting is a lot like a piece of music? The melody (or content) draws us in, the rhythm (pace) carries us along, and, as in a band or orchestra, everyone contributes to the whole. The facilitator, like the conductor, knows how to keep the group on target, how to bring out the best in each participant and how to pace the meeting to keep it lively, focused and humming along.

This metaphor came to me via a colleague when we recently participated in a meeting that was anything but well run. The meeting, composed of a group of stakeholders who had never even met much less worked together, started late and ran over the allocated time. The purpose of the meeting was never clarified. No one knew the issues behind the agenda items and worst of all, the facilitator was utterly unprepared—he had no sense of how to get things off to a good start and get people talking—and listening—to one another. He seemed unaware of the sponsoring organization’s expectations for the meeting and appeared to have no sense of the resource implications—human and financial—intrinsic to bringing 12 people together in one room for an hour and a half. After almost two hours, most of us left the room feeling like we’d just wasted our time—which, from most perspectives, we had!

As I was leaving the room, another participant said to me, “deadly, wasn’t it, sort of like being at a rehearsal in which everyone makes sound but none of it is music!”

How true, I thought. To my mind, a well-run meeting starts and ends on time. The pre-defined purpose, process and agenda are always reviewed and, as necessary, clarified with participants. Questions and comments are solicited. Right from the start each participant is made to feel valued and, throughout all are supported to contribute to the session based on their preparation, expertise, and understanding of their responsibility to others at the table.

The success of any meeting is not the sole responsibility of the facilitator, of course, any more than the performance of an orchestra is the sole responsibility of the conductor. But an effective facilitator, like an effective conductor, will plan each aspect of the meeting to ensure that each person can contribute his/her best; pace the meeting to make effective use of resources (time, money and people!) that are always limited; respect different opinions; and ultimately, support the group to achieve its purpose.

What kind of facilitator are you? What are your thoughts about meeting effectiveness? How can you avoid some of the pitfalls common to poorly run meetings? Answering these questions honestly—and addressing any gaps or limitations—can only help you to improve, as a facilitator and as a meeting participant. To no small degree the pursuit of excellence as a facilitator is The Art of People.